T1/46 — Jason & Lucia Robbery
Independent fan research. Not affiliated with Rockstar Games or Take-Two. Reviewed 27 October 2026. Map placements are unverified; scene groups and theories are hypotheses, not confirmed missions.
Timestamp identifies the retained video frame. The linked video starts at a rounded second; use the exact PTS above for frame matching.
Watch the official trailer · Community map proposal · Inspect on the interactive map
Map position
- status
Community proposal · exact position unverified
- community source coordinates
- lat
3871.25
- lng
-6365
- normalized atlas position
- x
506.429
- y
427.725
- note
These are fictional map coordinates, not GPS. Exact placement and camera heading are unverified.
Character appearances and confidence
- character
- Jason Duval
- confidence
high
- basis
The store-entry sequence provides a clearer view of the male participant; the face region, hair and white shirt correspond to Jason in the nearby unmasked bedroom sequence.
- review window
t1-car-store
- review frames
t1-car-store-8
t1-car-store-11
t1-car-store-13
- limit
A sequence-supported reviewer identification with a partly covered face. It does not prove that car turn and store entry form one continuous event.
- character
- Lucia Caminos
- confidence
high
- basis
The partly masked female participant's hair, face region and black top correspond to Lucia in the nearby unmasked bedroom sequence and the clearer entry view.
- review window
t1-car-store
- review frames
t1-car-store-5
t1-car-store-12
t1-car-store-13
- limit
Identity support is distinct from a claim that these trailer scenes are one mission.
Unidentified subjects
Geography review
- outcome
insufficient_anchor
- anchor semantics
An interior/doorway shot. The exact shop and camera point are not established.
- observations
A masked pair enters through a store doorway with weapons.
Only a restricted exterior view is visible behind the subjects.
Neighboring doorway frames at 76.800–77.200s show Uncle Jack’s branding, a partial red car to the left and a light pickup to the right. The branding does not supply a street address.
- comparison
The source places it north of T1/44 in the same Port Gellhorn road corridor.
- limits
The retained frame has no unique readable address or matching exterior facade.
Proximity of source points is not independent proof that this is the shop or robbery associated with T1/44.
- alternatives
Another store along I-404 or the Route 9 retail corridor.
A different event edited next to the car scene.
- decision
Keep the scene record and time. Treat the point as unverified; do not infer a common shop or mission from the map cluster.
- next test
Find an exterior of Uncle Jack’s matching the doorway, parking area, trees and road layout; compare the partial red car with the road-turn vehicle using distinctive details.
Source label checks
No source-label conflict recorded.
T1/44 and T1/46: one uninterrupted robbery sequence?
closed: Montage boundary established
The archived samples show red-car action, a bedroom scene and store entry as three distinct shots. The shared-robbery claim stays open.
Close the uninterrupted-sequence assumption. Only the T1/36 driver identity is newly resolved in this audit.
Observations
A red car is visible through the 72.700s sample, the bedroom by 73.300s, and the store entry by 76.900s.
White shirt/black bandana and dark top/red bandana are compatible across the car-interior and store contexts.
Limits
Matching outfits and named participants do not establish a single mission, chronology or getaway car.
The small red-car faces remain probable, not upgraded by montage proximity.
Comparisons
Alternative explanations
Next checks
Verify the red car’s occupants independently and match the store frontage or vehicle across another angle.
T1/46: what is visible outside the entrance?
closed: Entrance observations established
Neighboring doorway frames show Uncle Jack’s branding, a partial red car on the left and a light-colored pickup on the right. The pickup is not the only visible vehicle.
Close the limited entrance-content and branding questions. Neither vehicle ownership, a unique car match nor an exact store coordinate is resolved.
Observations
Uncle Jack’s lettering is visible on the window/door branding in the 76.800s neighbor frame; this is branding, not a readable street address.
At 77.000–77.200s a red car with an open door is visible left of the entrance; a light pickup is parked to the right.
The road-turn shot separately shows Pawn & Gun signage. Those labels cannot be treated as an established same-store name.
Limits
The partial red car view does not provide a reliable plate or a complete front/rear body comparison.
Different business labels do not prove different neighborhoods; a shared strip or parking area remains possible.
Comparisons
Alternative explanations
Next checks
Obtain an exterior view of the Uncle Jack’s frontage and independently match the red car’s distinctive details.
T1/44 → T1/46: does the evidence support one robbery?
inconclusive: Compatible connection; not confirmed
The partial red car at the store and compatible clothing provide a candidate link. Different visible business labels, incomplete vehicle views and unresolved geography prevent confirmation of one robbery, store or route.
Detailed comparison completed; the shared-event theory stays open. No identity confidence or exact coordinate is upgraded.
Observations
Six comparison dimensions are documented below using 16 new retained neighbor frames and a fresh check of the two community source records.
The positive vehicle clue is the partial red car outside the store, not the light pickup.
Limits
A compatible red car is not a uniquely identified vehicle.
A montage can show one event or separate events with reused clothes and vehicles.
No shared mission ID, exact location or direction of travel is established.
Comparisons
- aspect
People and clothing
- observed
The driver-interior and store footage share a white shirt/black bandana and dark top/red bandana. The red-car occupants are small and partly obscured.
- assessment
Compatible with the named pair; the red-car identities remain probable.
- missing
A clearer face or independently continuous view of the red-car occupants.
- aspect
Vehicles
- observed
T1/44 shows a red car with a dark roof and hood markings. A partial red car is visible left of the T1/46 doorway; the light pickup is on the right.
- assessment
A candidate vehicle connection is stronger than an argument based only on edit order. It is not a unique match.
- missing
Matching plate or distinctive damage, trim, wheel and body details from comparable angles. No plate transcription is accepted.
- aspect
Business signage
- observed
Pawn & Gun is visible in the road-turn shot; Uncle Jack’s branding is visible at the store entrance.
- assessment
The two visible labels are different. The entered store is not independently established as the Pawn & Gun business.
- missing
An exterior establishing view connecting the entrance to a named facade and its surroundings.
- aspect
Road and frontage
- observed
The road turn has a divider/island sign, utility alignment and a broad junction. The store looks onto a parking area with trees and overhead wires.
- assessment
Generic compatibility; no unique lane, facade or landmark correspondence across these views.
- missing
Match the divider, pylon alignment and entrance orientation in one independent exterior angle.
- aspect
Map proposals
- observed
The current source retains two distinct points, with T1/46 north of T1/44 in the proposed Port Gellhorn corridor. Neither position nor motion changed in this source check.
- assessment
This is one community source expressing two proposals, not two independent geography confirmations. No route or physical travel distance is established.
- missing
Independent visual registration to map geometry; resolve whether each point denotes camera, subject or area.
- aspect
Light and story order
- observed
Both shots use warm daylight, while a bedroom shot interrupts them in the trailer.
- assessment
Lighting and clothing permit a shared episode but cannot date it or establish before/after order.
- missing
Continuous action or another explicit event-order reference; no verified dialogue is available.
Alternative explanations
- label
One operation, different nearby viewpoints
- basis
Compatible clothes and the candidate red vehicle permit this; the map corridor remains a community proposal.
- label
Separate events with reused clothes or vehicles
- basis
The edit contains a bedroom cut, and no unique vehicle or event-order match has been established.
- label
One general area, different businesses or stops
- basis
Pawn & Gun and Uncle Jack’s labels differ; a common retail strip is possible but has not been mapped independently.
Next checks
Priority 1: match the red car at the entrance using a readable plate or multiple distinctive body details from comparable angles.
Priority 2: find an exterior of Uncle Jack’s and register its doorway, parking layout and road geometry independently.
Priority 3: verify the red-car occupants and obtain a continuous action or event-order reference.
Pending frame checks
- category
Geography
- priority
Normal
- action
Find an exterior of Uncle Jack’s matching the doorway, parking area, trees and road layout; compare the partial red car with the road-turn vehicle using distinctive details.